Help us shape the first truly useful AI orchestrator for geoscience projects. This short survey (5–7 minutes) will help us understand your team, your workflows, and whether GeoManager AI-Agent is a good fit for your seismic interpretation projects. By answering these questions, you’ll get a chance to join a small group of early adopters, influence our roadmap, and be among the first to try Geoplat’s new AI‑powered experience in real projects.


The quality of horizon tracking is one of the key challenges in seismic interpretation.
It is also one of the most time-consuming tasks.
Nowadays there is a large number of auto tracking algorithms available. However, addressing a structural interpretation workflow in a complex geological environment still poses considerable technological limitations. This drives both project timings and costs up significantly.

Accurate salt body interpretation (and other similar stratigraphic objects) usually presents a complex challenge for geoscientists. Extreme dip values, doubtful horizon interpretation (including multi-Z cases), velocity anomalies and poor reflectivity data - all these factors contribute to uncertainties in interpretation.

Traditional multi-attribute analysis techniques combined with RGB blending (or other blending variations) allow to identify geological objects in the seismic volume with a reasonable degree of accuracy. However, this approach has major disadvantages, such as false probabilities and the need to run complex and often
time-consuming attribute calculations.
